Skip to content
SolonIQ — wisdom, law, intelligence
Market Validation

Consumers want clearer preparation. Law firms want better opportunities.

SolonIQ has completed validation on both sides of the legal-services market. The evidence supports a focused pilot connecting guided consumer preparation with structured law-firm intake.

Evidence base

Two studies. One connected market problem.

Canadian consumer survey responses
366
Senior law-firm interviews in Ontario and the U.S.
16
Selected 10 out of 10 for stated likelihood of downloading JusticeChamp
15.6%
Two-sided market validation summary showing 366 consumer survey responses and 16 senior law-firm interviews.

Law-firm findings

The strongest needs were commercial and practical

Firms want suitable matters and prospective clients who arrive with the relevant facts, dates and records already organized.

01

Qualified opportunities

Firms want suitable matters that align with their practice and mandate criteria.

02

Better-prepared prospects

Relevant facts, dates and records should arrive organized before first contact.

03

Workflow fit

The service must improve intake without adding avoidable complexity to firm operations.

Bar chart showing qualified leads and better-prepared prospective clients as the two leading needs, each with six recorded responses.

Adoption test

Proof matters more than promises

Proven lead generation ranked first. Accuracy, quality, time savings and integration shaped the rest of the buying decision. Investors should read this as a clear commercialization test: SolonIQ must demonstrate measurable value per accepted and retained matter.

Bar chart showing proven lead generation as the leading influence on adoption, followed by accuracy and quality, time savings, integration, recommendations and pricing.

Investment thesis

Validation supports a focused pilot, not a claim of product-market fit

What the evidence supports

  • A real intake and referral problem
  • A clear firm value proposition
  • Demand across firm sizes
  • A measurable Ontario-first pilot

What remains to prove

  • Live referral quality
  • Acceptance and retained files
  • Paid conversion and retention
  • Scalable consumer acquisition

Pilot evidence

The beta must convert interest into operating evidence.

Measure 01

Funnel

Tracking completed intake, consumer consent, firm acceptance and retained files.

Measure 02

Quality

Measuring information completeness, mandate fit and firm-rated referral quality.

Measure 03

Economics

Measuring time saved, cost per retained matter and beta-to-paid conversion.

Methodology

Targeted interviews with senior law-firm representatives

SolonIQ conducted Zoom interviews with senior people at personal injury and employment firms in Ontario and the United States. Participating firms ranged from sole practitioners to firms with more than 100 lawyers.

Sixteen firms participated. The study workbook contains 15 recorded rows for the problem question and 14 recorded answers for some other questions. Charts use the available response base for each question. This purposive qualitative study identifies themes and buying criteria; it does not estimate the views of all law firms.

Bar chart showing interviewed firms ranged from sole practitioners to firms with more than 100 lawyers.

Next step

The evidence now points to a disciplined pilot

SolonIQ is preparing to test whether structured consumer preparation can improve referral quality and law-firm intake efficiency.

Discuss the pilot