01
Qualified opportunities
Firms want suitable matters that align with their practice and mandate criteria.
SolonIQ has completed validation on both sides of the legal-services market. The evidence supports a focused pilot connecting guided consumer preparation with structured law-firm intake.
Evidence base

Law-firm findings
Firms want suitable matters and prospective clients who arrive with the relevant facts, dates and records already organized.
01
Firms want suitable matters that align with their practice and mandate criteria.
02
Relevant facts, dates and records should arrive organized before first contact.
03
The service must improve intake without adding avoidable complexity to firm operations.

Adoption test
Proven lead generation ranked first. Accuracy, quality, time savings and integration shaped the rest of the buying decision. Investors should read this as a clear commercialization test: SolonIQ must demonstrate measurable value per accepted and retained matter.

Investment thesis
Pilot evidence
Measure 01
Tracking completed intake, consumer consent, firm acceptance and retained files.
Measure 02
Measuring information completeness, mandate fit and firm-rated referral quality.
Measure 03
Measuring time saved, cost per retained matter and beta-to-paid conversion.
Methodology
SolonIQ conducted Zoom interviews with senior people at personal injury and employment firms in Ontario and the United States. Participating firms ranged from sole practitioners to firms with more than 100 lawyers.
Sixteen firms participated. The study workbook contains 15 recorded rows for the problem question and 14 recorded answers for some other questions. Charts use the available response base for each question. This purposive qualitative study identifies themes and buying criteria; it does not estimate the views of all law firms.

Next step
SolonIQ is preparing to test whether structured consumer preparation can improve referral quality and law-firm intake efficiency.